Scott not so persuasive on this one
Scott Adams has another bite at the “alternative viewpoints” apple, here on the climate science boondoggle.
Remind your scientist that as far as you know there has never been a multi-year, multi-variable, complicated model of any type that predicted anything with useful accuracy. Case in point: The experts and their models said Trump had no realistic chance of winning.
? Is this some attempt at “Persuasion”?
I think solving the 3 body problem and planning the Grand Tour surely has to match those criteria ?
The maths that made Voyager possible - BBC News
Nasa's Voyager spacecraft have enthralled everyone with their exploits on the edge of the Solar System, but their…
Casting doubt is easy linguistically, mathematically not so much.